Specs aren’t sacred texts. They’re living, imperfect documents caught between ambitious roadmaps, real-world constraints, and the pressure to ship.
That’s why we were excited to see our latest thinking featured on SemiWiki.
Their new article leans into a problem every silicon team feels: what happens when the “source of truth” is incomplete, evolving, and spread across threads, notes, and hallway conversations? And what would it take to turn that into something engineers can actually trust?
For us, this isn’t theoretical. The way specs are created, refined, and interpreted shapes everything downstream, and ultimately whether silicon behaves the way everyone assumed it would.
The SemiWiki piece explores how teams can move beyond static PDFs and toward specs that behave more like living oracles that anchor a more intelligent verification flow.
This a sharp snapshot of the problems we’re obsessed with and a glimpse into the future we’re building with our customers.




